Essential Quick Lil Gems on Dealing with Women

[Sandy_Cheeks]

men don't "need" love the same way women "need" love. and it's not the same type of love either.

if you want to truly learn how guys think and feel on a very basic level, listen to the Black Phillip series.

Will do sir

 

[Malcolmxxx_23]

The ratchness of some of these women just have me some men too but its widely known that some of us only think with 1 head

So I'm at this diner with this chick and we're eating and talking...we start discussing our friends. She tells me none of her female friends are faithful Then she tells me about one of friends who is 31 and has a kid that her mother keeps, met a dude on POF. Nothing wrong with that except for ol girl had a man in the military who is good and faithful to her. She meets this dude off pof and its strictly sex and she lets dude bust in her a few times (no birth control either) and ends up pregnant.

Chick is like 3 or 4 months pregnant and gets an abortion and pof dude doesn't help pay or go for support. After she has the procedure the pof dude text her saying when can they have sex again

She ends up telling the military dude and he wants nothing to do with her. She supposely got his name tatted on her to prove her loyalty to him. All this was back in mid Dec. So today I go on to pof to see if any new fish are on there and I see this harlot on there with the headline “I'm Back on Here Again” These hoes man :wow:

what city breh?

 

[winb83]

We bear your children.

If i want a child i can adopt and if i want my own biological child i can get a surrogate mother to produce the child. after that it's just me and my kid. no child support or custody battles.

outside of sex and companionship what can a woman offer a man? i've looked at this over and over and i can't really come up with anything. as for sex i can take it or leave it. makes me no difference and the "companionship" most woman offer is totally conditional on you doing things for her and meeting her needs or wants.

a man can offer a woman stability, leadership, a man can provide for a woman, he can also offer sex and companionship. a man can create an environment where a woman can safely focus on raising her children and not have to work while he provides for both her and her children. men have far more to offer women than women have to offer in return.

 

[young3000]

what city breh?

Raleigh

 

[Malcolmxxx_23]

Raleigh

 

[Yuzo Lightheart]

a man can offer a woman stability, leadership, a man can provide for a woman, he can also offer sex and companionship. a man can create an environment where a woman can safely focus on raising her children and not have to work while he provides for both her and her children. men have far more to offer women than women have to offer in return.

a problem that i think has always existed is that men need women for their innocence and vulnerability etc, which as men, we cant experience on our own. as a man these qualities can only be experienced through someone else.

women instead require everything you just listed (strength, leadership, etc) through someone else. so the trade off of qualities is very different and this creates a fundamental conflict of interest. on one hand you have someone who just wants love on a basic level and on the other you have a person who is always trying to come up on a good deal. thats only bad for one party because they enter into the situation where they think they are getting something (innocence, vulnerability, etc) which doesnt even exist.


i wont say that all women cant fall in love but the reality of the situation is that most dont ever actually fall in love and instead are just trying to come up on some kind of good deal. conflict of interests. therefore i would say that only a very small percentage of women should ever be in a relationship at any time because of this. the drop in marriage rates and increase in one night stands, though wrong, is actually at least consistent with the reality that most women should not be taken seriously at all as far as relationship situations. its sounds bad to say it but no matter which way you analyze it, whether as a man or a woman, its true.

 

[Wild self]

Spoiler

"Imagine if, back when you were a child, instead of going to school every day your parents gave you the option of doing whatever else you wanted. Maybe you would choose to sit around all day and eat chocolate chip cookies. Or build a fort in the woods. Or play basketball with your friends. The point is, simply imagine if you had the freedom as a child to choose to do something besides that which you were compelled to do by your parents and the law. Is there any chance you would have been going to school five days a week? Even the most studious and responsible children would have regularly skipped out to partake in activities that were more fun.

Modern, educated, affluent, Western women are like the children in this example. They simply have so many seemingly fun, exciting, self-fulfilling options in life that motherhood cannot compete. We educate women and fill their heads with feminist propaganda which tells them that it's very important for them to have a career, and that being a mother is boring, thankless and degrading in comparison to the glamorous, big city professional life they could otherwise lead. At best, marriage and children are an afterthought, something to be considered when 30 is approaching and a woman knows that her best years are behind her.

Is it any wonder, then, that women who are in a position to choose, choose fun over the responsibility of motherhood? Who wants to be changing diapers when you could instead be having mimosas with your girlfriends? Or spend thousands of dollars on childcare instead of blowing your entire paycheck at Nordstrom? Or commit to one man when you can leverage your physical prime looks for the attention of several alphas?

Feminists would counter that this is equally the fault of men who refuse to grow up and get serious about marriage and children, but of course this is nonsense. We all know that it is women who control the sexual marketplace through their monopoly of p*ssy. It is women who determine the price of access to their vaginas, be it lifelong commitment and support or three strong cocktails and some smoothly delivered dialogue. Men simply respond to the reality of the sexual marketplace that women create through their choices. If for some reason every woman suddenly decided that she would only fukk men who wore chicken suits, by the end of the week we'd all be discussing tips on how to keep our feathers from being ruffled when we sit down and the best techniques for drinking through a beak. The undeniable fact is that female lifestyle choices dictate the choices that men make in response.

For this reason, for most of history female choice was artificially limited by social convention and law. With few exceptions, women simply did not have a realistic option of choosing to be anything except a wife and mother. In turn, this meant that in order to get p*ssy, your average man had little choice except to become a husband and father. Both men and women had fewer choices for individual "fun" and "self-fulfillment", but the species thrived because of it. Feminism, or female empowerment, completely upends this historical arrangement and thereby destroys the family. With the freedom to choose, many women choose themselves over their potential children, and the population is no longer growing at replacement rate as a result.

The elephant in the room that no one wants to address is that this is an inevitable consequence of female empowerment. If you give women affluence and the ability to choose what they want to do, not enough will choose to become young mothers of multiple children. It's hard choose the socially responsible thing over the fun thing. And perhaps this is not a female weakness, but a human weakness. It's hard to imagine that many men would do any different in the same situation. But whether or not men would do the same is simply irrelevant, because whether one likes it or not, women are the ones whose choices dictate the outcomes of the sexual marketplace, the strength of the family structure and ultimately population growth or decline.

The unspeakable, monstrously politically incorrect conclusion is that societies that empower females will thus inexorably slide toward demographic oblivion as a consequence of low birth rates, while those that retain a more patriarchal structure with limitations on female choice, independence and affluence will continue to grow. And this is not some gross conjecture. All you have to do is compare the birth rates of Muslim countries to Japan, the U.S. and Western Europe to verify this fact.

The battle against feminism will ultimately be one of survival."

Feminism is basically destroying the population #s and some say that without kids to replace this generation, places like America and Western Europe is gonna suffer a population decrease that is beyond repair.

 

[Wild self]

And heads in here, I need help. If you found a genuinely good girl and do something CREATIVE for Valentine's Day, what do you do or where do you go to?

 

[Doin2Much Williams]

And heads in here, I need help. If you found a genuinely good girl and do something CREATIVE for Valentine's Day, what do you do or where do you go to?

.

 

[Turbulent]

a problem that i think has always existed is that men need women for their innocence and vulnerability etc, which as men, we cant experience on our own. as a man these qualities can only be experienced through someone else.

women instead require everything you just listed (strength, leadership, etc) through someone else. so the trade off of qualities is very different and this creates a fundamental conflict of interest. on one hand you have someone who just wants love on a basic level and on the other you have a person who is always trying to come up on a good deal. thats only bad for one party because they enter into the situation where they think they are getting something (innocence, vulnerability, etc) which doesnt even exist.


i wont say that all women cant fall in love but the reality of the situation is that most dont ever actually fall in love and instead are just trying to come up on some kind of good deal. conflict of interests. therefore i would say that only a very small percentage of women should ever be in a relationship at any time because of this. the drop in marriage rates and increase in one night stands, though wrong, is actually at least consistent with the reality that most women should not be taken seriously at all as far as relationship situations. its sounds bad to say it but no matter which way you analyze it, whether as a man or a woman, its true.

Spoiler

 

[sixsixtwo]

And heads in here, I need help. If you found a genuinely good girl and do something CREATIVE for Valentine's Day, what do you do or where do you go to?

I would go to Build-A-Bear & make a custom made card from Cardstore.com who has a V-Day special at the moment.. $1.49 for a card, first class shipping free..

Valentine’s Day « dannyfrom504

 

[winb83]

a problem that i think has always existed is that men need women for their innocence and vulnerability etc, which as men, we cant experience on our own. as a man these qualities can only be experienced through someone else.

women instead require everything you just listed (strength, leadership, etc) through someone else. so the trade off of qualities is very different and this creates a fundamental conflict of interest. on one hand you have someone who just wants love on a basic level and on the other you have a person who is always trying to come up on a good deal. thats only bad for one party because they enter into the situation where they think they are getting something (innocence, vulnerability, etc) which doesnt even exist.


i wont say that all women cant fall in love but the reality of the situation is that most dont ever actually fall in love and instead are just trying to come up on some kind of good deal. conflict of interests. therefore i would say that only a very small percentage of women should ever be in a relationship at any time because of this. the drop in marriage rates and increase in one night stands, though wrong, is actually at least consistent with the reality that most women should not be taken seriously at all as far as relationship situations. its sounds bad to say it but no matter which way you analyze it, whether as a man or a woman, its true.

Briffault's Law explains the cold-hearted truth about women and their so called companionship and love.

The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place.

many women don't date and marry for things such as love. they date and marry for financial purposes. for a woman if she dates a man to at least some of an extent she gains access to his resources so to them it makes sense to associate themselves with men who have more resources than them.

when you say men need women for their innocence and vulnerability to me that's basically saying a man wants a woman to need him to take care of her so he can play the role of provider and feel needed.

for the most part dating and relationships aren't beneficial to men at all but greatly benefit women. this is why women pressure for commitment and ultimately marriage because these things provide stability to them. they provide no such benefits to the man. the benefits a man gains from such things are purely egotistical.

really these egotistical desires are a trap. on one hand you have someone that egotistically wants to be needed and on the other you have a person who wants access to more resources than they can provide for themselves. the person who wants more is more than willing to play the role the egotistical person desires to gain access to such resources.

many guys right now are with women that don't love them at all. women who are just playing a role to gain access to what he has. many of these guys will never truly know this either. they'll never question their woman because they've become emotionally invested and attached to her even if those feelings aren't mutual.

 

[Scustin Trillberlake]

We bear your children.

 

[winb83]

And heads in here, I need help. If you found a genuinely good girl and do something CREATIVE for Valentine's Day, what do you do or where do you go to?

I'm not even trying to be cynical or shyt on you or what you got going on but
you should never tell yourself things like "she's a genuinely good girl" because in reality you may be right but you may be wrong. the human mind is funny it will always try to prove itself right and even overlook things to reach its desired conclusion.

every guy that ever got screwed over by a chick thought she wan a genuinely good girl just like you're saying this one is and they were wrong. perhaps you aren't wrong but perhaps you are.

 

[Yuzo Lightheart]

when you say men need women for their innocence and vulnerability to me that's basically saying a man wants a woman to need him to take care of her so he can play the role of provider and feel needed.

i agree to an extent that there is a ego boost factor but a woman really is the only kind of person a man can be allowed to be genuinely sensitive and intimate around too. he cant really get that level of intimacy from his friends or his family. even a woman's face is designed to make men feel that way. they have less masculine and more baby like features which are designed to reduce aggression etc.

the cruel irony is that women represent the only sanctuary and refuge to be a more sensitive and vulnerable person for a man, but its not like that the other way around for her.