I said it's the same for a attractive girl on a dating site she may get 800 guys msg but only a few are of worth.
If your a guy that just cares for eye candy and sex then yeah you will be winning
But money has never attracted females of worth not now not ever
Did Tim Duncan status and money get loyalty?
Did mike Tyson aggressive nature status and money procure loyalty?
Thays all I'm saying yes with more money and status you can attract more women but quality doesn't always mean quality.
Because all it takes is one
If your a guy that just cares for eye candy and sex then yeah you will be winning
But money has never attracted females of worth not now not ever
Did Tim Duncan status and money get loyalty?
Did mike Tyson aggressive nature status and money procure loyalty?
Thays all I'm saying yes with more money and status you can attract more women but quality doesn't always mean quality.
Because all it takes is one
Look, I'm not trying to be difficult here or feign ignorance to your point.
You're saying just because you can attract many women doesn't mean any are of "quality". Granted.
But just because someone can attract few doesn't mean any are quality either.
And all things being equal, the guy that has more to choose from has a higher likelihood of selecting a woman that fits his personal definition of "quality".
In regards to the biology point, to believe that your intrinsic rewards are wholly independent of outside stimuli is an amazing feat of naivete. But we're far off topic here.
Last edited: